Wampum belt of the Native Americans Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Wampum belt of the Native Americans - Essay ExampleHowever, even if the objective of high-octane and high quality health care is universal for these countries, all have developed different schemes in aesculapian care go (Arah, et al., 2003). Table 1 compares the system of health care in these quartet countries in terms of the funding, framework, guidelines and assessment performance. This data will be very important in the comparisons to be dealt with in the succeeding pages.In Canada, the adapted system which started in the late 1950s, has transformed from a macrocosm and territorial hospital insurance structure to a comprehensive, compulsory system as we know immediately (Lemieux, 1989). This system ensures that taxes benefit taxpayers through a universal medical program and that no one is denied of medical care. Since the medical control is run by the government and funded by the taxpayers, it is but necessary that more safeguards be put in place as claims of a rusting syste m develops (Arnett, 1996 Cihak, 2004 Hsieh, 2007).A decent to health Care. Goodman discusses that Canadians lose the right to health care in a universal system basically because the enactment of patients increase tremendously in this kind of scheme. As a result, there are very a couple of(prenominal) people that get treatment and services are delayed because of waitlists and queues. He also further indicated that base on the Frasier Institute, ten times more patients in Canada are waitlisted compared to that in New Zealand. Apparently, the population in Canada is around nine times more than New Zealands populace, in addition to several otherwise factors which should have been considered such as number of hospitals and the nature of health care needed and the quality of services received.Leonard Peikoff (2006) expresses the American viewpoint of this myth. In his speech entitled Health Care is Not a Right, he articulates that the right of one man should never impose responsibil ity to another