To Falsify or not to Falsify :: Science Scientific Essays

To evade or not to FalsifyConsider for a moment the views of Hellenic and Hellenistic science. Hellenic science was a science of the big picture. skill which often overlooked small details. Hellenistic science, on the other hand, was such(prenominal) more mathematical and precise. The shift from Hellenic to Hellenistic science was energy more than a change of perspective in science. Right or wrong aside, scientists perspectives changed and along with it what was allowed to be scientific. To quote Khun, What is it that transforms an app bently temporary dissension into an inescapable conflict. How can an conceptual scheme that one generation admiringly describes as subtle, flexible, and complex, become for a later generation merely obscure, ambiguous, and tactless?(Khun 76) Whether we like it or not, science is subjective. There are certain worldwide standards of science that all palm must follow, such as the observational method, but among the different scientific field sc ience changes. What works in one field may not work in another. Sir Karl Popper claims The bill of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability.(Popper23). He then states Induction, i.e. certainty based on many observations, is a myth (Popper25). This establishs problems for certain fields of science.. His theory accounts for the hard sciences, chemistry, physics and astronomy, but not for the bats sciences. These soft sciences deal with different set of limitations and problems. Many so called pseudo-sciences deal with people, not constant non-sentient bodies. In these sciences, the variables are limitless and the best predictions scientists can produce are probabilities. So what about other sciences such as psychology, sociology, meteorology, and medicate? There are numerous fields of science that deal with fortune and correlations, which are part of the inductive method of science. Whats there to say to these fields? For these sciences induction must remain valid when deduction is not possible. In the hard sciences, such as chemistry, physics, and astronomy, deduction is applicable to the validity of a theory, and therefore deduction can be used to accurately rig a theory. The soft sciences require induction for theory verification as well as deduction. Since I am a psychology major, I will use psychology and sociology to refute Poppers claims of falsifiability. The examples that I give are done with the scientific method. When necessary, random samples are used and confounding variables are negated. These studies were done within scientific guidelines.