Henrietta Lacks

The characters from the book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks cause attach to objects that are substanceful to them. It is noniced that a certain object had a signifi hind determinationt meaning by analyzing the scene and the character. Dr. Geys assistant, Mary set forth Henrietta Lacks red pinpoint polish on her toes. She described Henrietta being an developed fair sex, something Mary never thought of. Henriettas relatives described Henrietta with her red nail polish. The red nail polish was a meaningful object to Henrietta because it accomplished her. Dr.Gey was attached to Hela mobile phones once he made the incredible observation. He didnt look into for money, he genuinely did it for science. He sent the Hela cells for other scientists to experience the cells for themselves. He changed science for his genuine passion for it. Perhaps the most interesting character, Deborah Lacks, was attached to a a few(prenominal) things. While Deborah was with Rebecca, she sh owed her the contents in her purse. She carried eachthing she had ab forbidden her fuck off with her. There were videotapes, documentaries, articles, and a few birthday cards that Deborah bought for her mother, Henrietta.Deborah was attached to these items because that was solely she knew about her mother. In a way, that was how she felt connected to Henrietta. A few days later when Rebecca was with Deborah, Rebecca noniced a folder on her p strokeow. They were Henriettas aesculapian examination folders. Deborah wouldnt permit Rebecca touch her mothers checkup folder. Un give care whole the other items Deborah let Rebecca see, Henriettas aesculapian folder was divergent. And it clearly had a contrastive, more significant meaning than the other items.Henrietta LacksHenrietta Lacks Cells taken from a childlike African American woman in 1951 helped scientists cure polio. Cells from the aforesaid(prenominal) woman contri aloneed to scientific advantages in genus Cancer, factor mapping, and steady the atom bomb. The mother of five did non life to go through her cells had such magnificence. She never knew, in fact, that they were being harvested. Todays aesculapian advances are based on make outs that people now confacer unethical, whereas affirm when Henrietta live, they did non all the same think twice about ethics. Henrietta Lacks did not experience the cells taken from her could possibly be used to develop a multimillion-dollar medical industry.In an even crueler twist of fate, her descendants lived in poverty without access to inexpensive health care. The book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, tells the story of a women, Henrietta Lacks, and her family. Ms. Lacks was treated for cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins infirmary in 1951. Her malignant cervical cells were harvested and distributed to become the first immortal cell line widely used for scientific research, including their use in the festering of the pol io vaccine. The story tells what happened after Ms.Lacks death to her family, a measly African American family living in Maryland. A family who, today, would be considered lamentable. The story brings up key ethical issues of biomedical research, which were evolving during that era (Skloot, Rebecca). Henrietta Lacks died of an aggressive cervical cancer that invaded virtually her entire personify in 1951. A common practice at the time, samples of cancer cells were taken for study. Some cells were taken by a researcher who was attempting to develop immortal cell lines for scientific purposes.In the 1950s, the practice of winning routine tissue samples without react from patients was not uncommon, and anonymising the source wasnt a main concern. HeLa cells and the concerns that surrounded them touched on several issues in medicine. matchless was the issue of victimization tissue samples without consulting patients, m whatsoever of whom would freely turn inate if asked. Changes in how such samples are taken and handled, and in the processes used to collect take over, break improved the use of assured consent in research.Patients submitting biopsies for diagnostic purposes, for example, power be asked if they are imparting to donate cells to research (Smith, S. E. ). if a devour-to doe with wanted to diagnose, treat, experiment or keep body set offs, thats what he did. Patients never questioned doctors they were trusted implicitly. Consent was conferred by the simple step of exhibit up in a doctors office. Today, we cope we require to go out and ask questions, and thus our consent is necessary legally. Further, we understand the importance of withholding consent until we feel fully informed about the benefits and consequences of what that consent will mean.There were not conformed consent laws until recently. Informed consent is more than in effect(p) now getting a patient to sign a create verbally consent form. It is a process on communicat ion between a patient and physician that results in the patients authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention (Informed Consent). Since everyone has dissimilar preferences, there will eer be differences in the interference of care among people. This becomes a problem when physicians confirm a bias against certain races and ethics.As a physician, all treatment options should be discussed and equally available to patients, regardless of their race or ethnicity which results in informed consent on the patients behalf. There was a lack of respect, or an unfitness to communicate, in both directions, between blacks and doctors tooshie in the 1850s. Skin color, and the problems that can result from low income, lack of education, and illiteracy the inability to read, and/or understand the English language also contributed to the mistreatment of blacks.Patients overcome those challenges by passing a respectful doctor, or a supporter to help the,. Back when Henr ietta lived, that was not easy to fins. Differences in healthcare outcomes can result from the history of different races too. Henrietta was treated with radiation, which left her body burned and blackened. She and her family asked themselves many times whether the treatment was really helping her but they never considered asking the doctor to do something different, make a different recommendation, or even just to fail. Skloot, Rebecca) today, authorize patients know that they can insert themselves into all decision-making about their own medical care. They can and should discuss any and all protocols to make decisions as part of their own healthcare team. And, empowered patients know that if they want to, they can say, zero(prenominal) In conclusion, informed consent was not needed when Henrietta lived therefore scientists took her cells without her knowing. A doctor did what HE wanted to do. But today, we now know that consent is legality.Any treatments should be discussed w ith the patient regardless of their race or their illness. Henrietta was mistreated, her body was burned, but her and her family did not want to question the doctor in fear or being looked down on. But today patients know that they have the by rights to know exactly what is being done to them, and can ask any questions they feel necessary. If it were not for the doctors and scientists that had taken Henriettas cells, we today, would not have the advancements in healthcare that we do.Henrietta LacksThe Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Introduction The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is written by Rebecca Skloot, who is an award winning science writer. The story is of a young black women, Henrietta Lacks, who was diagnosed with cancer in 1951, at the John Hopkins Hospital. Cells were taken from her body during her examinations, without her knowledge. They were used to develop the first immortal cell line. Her cells became very significant for the development of vaccines. Her family , however, has not received any benefit and still cannot even afford health insurance.They do not even know that the cells run to Henrietta. This has raised many ethical questions on the research that has been done using Henriettas cells. Discussion Henriettas life had not been an easy one. Long before she got ill with cancer her father abandoned her in childhood. She was married at a very early age. At the age of 14 she was a mother. She then moved to the Turner Station with her economise, who was not so faithful to her. At Turner Station, she and her family faced a life of segregation and poverty. Despite all the difficulties that she faced in her life, she still remained an enthusiastic person.She had a spirit that was not able to break. She was described by her friends as a person having a cheerful disposition. She was an also a person who was quick to laugh. She would also go out dancing with her cousin Sadie. The most important and strong side of Henrietta was her motherhood . Her cousin, Sadie also suspected that she delayed seeking medical attention, because she was afraid that it index affect her fertility and prevent her from having more children. She was extremely subject matter humble when she realized that the surgery has made her infertile.She was angry and sad at the fact that the doctors did not tell her beforehand that what the surgery would do to her. When her condition worsened, the doctors told her husband not to bring her children to visit her. This made her even more heart broken and devastated. She and her family, especially her children, led a very difficult life. unconstipated after her death, her family and her children were not told about the cells of Henrietta being used in research. They were not given nay benefit, whatsoever, of the research on her cells and the huge mounts of money generated from it. The Lacks family is so ridiculous even now that they cannot afford even life insurance. Henriettas daughter, Deborah, did not know anything at all about the importance and the use of her mothers cells. She was devastated to read about the cells of her mother. She was filled with many questions that nobody was able to answer. She was curious to know that if her mothers cells were so important and have helped medical science so much. why were her children not even able to afford health insurance for themselves?Henrietta was a very sociable person. She would have allowed the John Hopkins institute to carry out research on her cells. She was a person who was very close to her family. She would have wanted the John Hopkins Institute to take care of her family and children if they used her cells. She would never have wanted her family to be treated the way they were treated back then and even now. Conclusion Henrietta was a very strong woman. Her parting to medical science has been exceptional. However, her family should also have been given benefits.Henrietta LacksRacist Experiments racial discrimination is immortal just like Henriettas cells it will always be around. People would do anything to be the first to discover something. At the end of the day its all about the money. The Mississippi appendectomies and the Tuskegee experiments were similar in the way that the government forced treatment upon minorities without consent. Henriettas scale was different than Mississippi and Tuskegee because the doctor in Johns Hopkins didnt experiment on her real(a) body but on her cells without consent.Henriettas case the Tuskegee experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies are all different cases in different locations but serve the same purpose which is to take advantage of poor and uneducated minorities to further medical research. The Tuskegee Experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies were both horrible cases and dealt with lots of racism and ignorance towards people who didnt know any better. The purpose of The Tuskegee experiments was to see how lues venerea affected blacks as op posed to whites.The treatment was to basically come in get injected with syphilis if you didnt already have and the doctors would watch how you die. The people in these experiments were poor and uneducated black males who were coned into giving their life away. The doctors in this experiment lured the assay subjects in the saying they were getting treated for Bad Blood. These racialist and disturbing experiments lasted for 40 years between 1932-1972.The purpose of the Mississippi Appendectomies was to desexualize America of bad genes meaning anyone women who was mentally challenge, a criminal, Black, Alcoholic, etc would get sterilize so they couldnt reproduce anymore. Doctors figured that in order to stop mentally challenged blacks alcoholics etc from walking this earth is to sterilize them and make sure their genes dont flow in the gene pool. The treatment for these appendectomies was horrible it was just blacks that were treated it also Indians and poor whites.The test subject s were all sterilized against their will and without their knowing. These appendectomies were racist and cruel. More than half of the women in Mississippi were sterilized. These treatments lasted for about 33 years between 1930s and 1963. Henrietta Lacks case was different than Mississippi and Tuskegee in some ways. In Henriettas case the doctors took her cells from her cervix but like in the Mississippi and Tuskegee cases they took them without Henriettas permission and launched a multimillion-dollar medical industry after she died.The purpose of taking Henriettas cells was to just run a couple tests until they died but they ended up living and growing. Instead of state Henrietta and her family what they have been doing the doctors kept the discovery to themselves. When the discovery of the immortal cells because known every doctor got their hands on them and started test experiments on them, sending the cells to space, running test on the cells to find a cure to aids and cervica l cancer etcRacism wasnt far from this case the doctor in Henriettas case figured that telling her what they were doing would only confuse her and her family even more so they just figure to not tell her or her family at all. This case started in 1951 and the research on the cells still goes on till the present. Racism hovers of this country and is always in the backs of everyones minds. Henriettas case the Tuskegee experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies are all different cases in different locations but serve the same purpose which is to take advantage of poor and uneducated minorities to further medical research.In Tuskegee doctors took advantage of uneducated black males to find an answer to a question. The Mississippi appendectomies sterilized innocent uneducated and poor females because the government was trying to wipe out bad genes and in the Henrietta lacks case doctors took her cells without consent, found out they were immortal and launched and multimillion-dollar medical industry. In the end it is so all about the money.