A Permanent Death - Capital Punishment :: essays research papers

There are five basic reasons that society uses when rattling(a) "punishment" that Ive been able to conclude from my readings. I will discuss these societal concepts and raise that the finis penalty does non serve to further them. As a result William Smith should non be subject to the death penalty and in fact the same should be abolished from our system of "punishment". disincentiveDeterrence is basically defined as "the punishment should fit the crime." on a lower floor this concept, the individual committing the crime and society are prevented from committing this action again. In the mooring of the death penalty, an individual kills another human and he is "punished" for it by death. Punishment is supposed to be a temporary penalization for a wrongful action. Death is far from temporary. One is to learn from ones mistakes. How can the soulfulness learn if they are paying for their mistake with their life? In Ernest new wave den Haags ar ticle, "The Ultimate Punishment A Defense" he states, "The death penalty is our harshest punishment. It is irrevocable it ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily im prisoning them." (Haag, 251). By imposing the death penalty the individual does not learn from their mistakes and neither does society.thriftinessUnder this concept, punishment should be economical. As Haag points out, "...the monetary cost of sympathetic a capital sentence is excessive." (Haag, 253). Further, "...actual monetary costs are trumped by the importance of doing justice." (Haag, 253). Additionally there are specific costs associated with retentiveness an inmate on death row, (i.e. the cost of the specially built prison blocks, the need for maximum security, etc.) and more. These costs clearly out weigh the habitue costs incurred to house a regular inmate. Deterrence is clearly not served by imposing the death penalty and society aims for justice are thwa rted. RestitutionSociety demands that the punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. You can not bring in the murdered person back by taking the prisoners life. "Punishment-regardless of the motivation is not intended to revenge, offset, or compensate for the victims suffering or to be mensural by it." (Haag, 253). RetributionThe community demands that justice be served. Would justice not equally be served and in fact may be remedy served by life imprisonment? I believe it would be a worse punishment to endure a life sentence in prison.