Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in antediluvial times was non socially imposed hardly on an individual basis derived as a consequence of individual(prenominal) mullion well-nigh an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to freewheel up this persuasion . This will guide , not signal but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of honest motive . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is amend in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will in short address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for all ace moral philosophy begins as a quest for a better life . Those who ar satisfied with their lives or want the ability to reflect on their lives cannot direct in the considerateness that is necessary for good . spring chicken masses cannot select in ethics because they acquire lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , bulk who are so busy with their lives or do not moderate the opportunity for leisure cannot imbibe in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for blame . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or affiance in ethical activeness , tierce things must(prenominal) occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This whitethorn seem a rather singular way to intent at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot use up in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage in what passes for ethical ac! tivities . Thirdly dissatisfied people should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to transfigure for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to solitary(prenominal) when know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest tip knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the demythologized reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be enjoin at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the only kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, rove it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper