Critique

Running head : CRITIQUE[Author s Name][Tutor s Name][Class]AbstractThe larn of memories and the impact of external factors on memories require thoroughgoing choice of explore and analytical methods . In the desire to investigate subjective ideas , the researcher risks producing biased and erratic research resultsThe subjectivity of truth and the subjectivity of memories were the subjects of various philosophic , physiological , and psychological studies . The researchers were establishing to prove the subjectivity of memories and the authenticity of bypast truths , but it seems that the problem of subjective narration and individualized indication of wiz s memories will forever remain a scientific and philosophical puzzleIn their research , Ochs and Capps (1997 ) are trying to prevail us closer to understanding the sources of our memories , and the reasons for which we distort or turn fell to documentaryly interpret memories . However , the work of Ochs and Capps (1997 ) seems to be deprive of some(prenominal) logical line , and is presented in the form of weaken touchable life examples , which contribute hardly be united to one subject Remembering is subjective event (Ochs Capps , 1997 , and it is catchy to plead this statement , yet it is doubtful that the researchers have chosen an entrance method to prove it . First of all , the researchers do non depart objective situational discipline about the sources of real life examples they single-valued function in their work as a result , these examples cannot experience relevant conclusions on the subject of the research .

For example , the emit between a child and his beat at the dinner table is highly biased , and we can interpret it in many ways : the father power have aesculapian problems with his memory or he qualification be alone playing with the child . Second , Ochs and Capps (1997 ) try to support their recount with the results of anterior studies , but they do not evaluate objective situational data and the circumstances in which the cited dialog took place . As a result the information from previous studies is almost inapplicable to the real life examples which the authors used in their researchThe choice of be qualitative methods is the basis for making any research relevant and objective . The lack of critical information makes the results of any study biased and unreliable . Moreover , the results of much(prenominal) researches can hardly be used in push similar investigations and require thorough re-consideration before they are interpreted as the basis for upcoming researchReferencesOchs , E Capps , L (1997 . report authenticity . Journal of communicative and Life History , 7 (1-4 , pp . 83-89PAGEPAGE 3 ...If you want to energize a full essay, monastic order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper